|
You'll stay current with our monthly newsletter plus occasional action alerts, news and updates Issue Areas:Scenic Overlook
Read past issues of Scenic America's monthly newsletter |
Opinion Polls: Billboards are Ugly, Intrusive, and Uninformative
Each year, more than 200 communities seek tighter billboard control -- the Between 1957 and 1977, at least eight polls found 70% or more of respondents to be anti-billboard. In the 1990s, people in Florida, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Texas, Michigan, and Missouri all agree that billboards are litter on a stick. In fact, virtually every credible poll that's been done reveals one fact: Americans do not like billboards. Billboards Degrade Scenic Beauty, Communities Where do people want to live, work, and visit? Places of great natural beauty and distinctive community character. And most people agree billboards degrade natural beauty and community character.
We Need Fewer Billboards, Not More Public patience with new billboard construction is wearing thin across the country. In fact, although the number of billboards along our roads increases by thousands annually, most Americans believe we already have either too many billboards or the right number. Almost no one supports the rapid rate of billboard growth we're currently experiencing.
There are many things taxpayers are willing to pay for. Cutting trees along public rights-of-way to improve billboard visibility is not one of these things.
Though billboard operators like to portray billboards as providing essential information, in fact, most people get little or no useful information from billboards. 72% of those surveyed in a Rhode Island study responded that they received either very little or no useful information about products and services from billboards. In Florida, the margin of those who derived more information from official information (LOGO) signs more than billboards for useful information about restaurants, gas stations and other roadside services was 63% to 16%. In Missouri, the margins were 68% to 18% in favor of LOGO signs. The hundreds of communities that fight billboards each year clearly reflect the will of the people. In virtually every reputable poll, significant majorities of Americans oppose billboard blight. The support for billboard control spans education levels, race, and gender; and it knows no geographic boundaries. People, in other words, are tired of watching their scenic roadsides transformed into oversized Yellow Pages.
Polls were: EPIC MRA September, 1997 Survey, questions commissioned by Michigan United Conservation Clubs; "An Analysis of Attitudes Concerning Billboards in the State of Rhode Island for Scenic Rhode Island," by Fleming and Associates, February, 1990; "Survey on Outdoor Advertising," for Florida House of Representatives, Transportation Committee, by Institute for Public Opinion Research, Florida International University, October, 1995; "Public Attitudes Toward Billboards in New Hampshire," for New Hampshire Dept. Of Transportation, by University of New Hampshire, July, 1994; "Statewide Public Opinion Poll on Billboards," for Scenic Missouri, by E. Terrance Jones November, 1994; "Assessing Public Opinion Regarding Billboards in the Houston Area," for Scenic Houston, by Telesurveys Research Associates, August, 1996. |
Background on Billboards
|







surest sign that citizens are fed up with billboard blight. Though the industry claims billboards are essential providers of important information, polls reveal that they most people see them as ugly, intrusive, and uninformative.